As I sit and ponder this question I realize that I grew up
during a time when technology was really beginning to take a strong hold in our
public schools. In the days prior to the
21st century classrooms were full of blackboards with teacher
centered instruction. Students would
often tire and tune out of that days lesson because of the monotony from one
teacher to the next. I remember these
days in my elementary and middle school years.
It was in my high school years that I began to see the use of SMART
boards and computer labs. A transition
was taking place that allowed each student the opportunity to locate
information in a different and faster way.
It also allowed us to create, share, and collaborate with each other in
ways we had never experienced. In doing
so we were able to learn on a new level how to read, write, collaborate and
critique.
In Literacy 2.0
Reading and Writing in 21st Century Classrooms Frey, Fisher, and
Gonzalez make a clear cut as to the difference between literacy 1.0 and literacy
2.0. They encourage us to look at
literacy 1.0 as a means of accessing information where as literacy 2.0 is a
means of finding, using, producing, and sharing information (p.1, 2010). I can see this clearly now that I am an
educator myself. As when I was younger
literacy 1.0 was prevalent by the use of paper, pencil, and textbooks. Today Literacy 2.0 is the star of the show,
allowing students to show case their work and collaborate with each other. Often times my students are using blogs,
wikipages, twitter, and facebook to communicate with each other. It only makes sense for us to use and promote
accurate, safe, and logical use of these tools in the classroom since this is
the way of communication for this generation.
Frey et al. goes on to say, “Today’s students have a deep-seated need to
communicate and collaborate, to access information at any time of the day or
night, and to have the tools that will enable them to synthesize, evaluate, and
create information”(p.5, 2010). By allowing
students to use technology while becoming literate students they are able to
critically think, write, and respond in ways they never would with paper and
pencil. It is my goal to always be using
literacy 2.0 but I realize that often times students can use literacy 2.0
without know literacy 1.0. With this in
the back of my mind I plan on showing my students how to access information
first and then dig deeper into the depths of literacy 2.0.
References
Frey, Nancy, Douglas Fisher, Alex Gonzalez. Literacy 2.0 Reading and Writing in 21st Century Classrooms. Bloomington, IN:Solution Tree Press, 2010. Print.
I couldn't agree more with you and the authors of Literacy 2.0 on the topic of student's needs to collaborate with each other. Students today have never known a world without Internet being easily accessible. This means that for most students, using the Internet is a strength and an interest for them. Just as teachers should integrate other interests as much as possible into their instruction to improve student engagement, teachers should also do this with technology. Literacy can be integrated so easily, especially when you begin using Wikis, Blogs, and other Web 2.0 forms teachers have free access too. Thanks for your great post and insight!
ReplyDeleteChristina ~ Your statement, "I plan on showing my students how to access information first" is very crucial. I believe many times teachers assume students know how to access/find relevant information because they have technology at their fingertips. This is not always the case. I worked in an urban district where many students had phones and/or some form of a tablet; however, they had no insight on how to find information on the internet other than going to Wikipedia. Once this step was successful we moved on to other Web 2.0 tools and as an educator it was very rewarding to watch them communicate and collaborate with their peers.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more. When I was first in this district I assumed the students knew how to find information. I quickly realized they had no idea. On top of that they wanted to site nothing but Wikipedia sources. We talked about how a Wiki page is someone just like you and me posting information on a topic they are interested in and how their information could be flawed or even misleading. I then began showing them things to look for to see if it's a credible source or not such as the copyright date. After this they began to compare their credible sources with wikipages and quickly found how they can be misleading. It was definitely eye opening for many of my students.
DeleteChristina,
DeleteI too like that you said we need to teach students how to access information. As much as students think they know about technology, there is still so much that they need help with. They know how to use it to do what they want to do, but still struggle to use it in regards to educations. Even something as simple as logging into their google drive can be a painful experience!
I do see a major jump in what students know about technology and what they are able to do every year. Each group is better than the next. It’s amazing how much they are learning to do at an earlier age now.
Tami,
DeleteI agree with your statement. I think the whole notion of "digital natives" muddied the water. Yes, students know how to use the technology, but they don't know how to learn with technology. This is one reason I prefer the term digital learners instead.
Dr. Dell
Your post is great. I really like your quote from the book about student's need to have access and to share. Children today have so much information available to them that it is hard for me to imagine how they are processing it all. I really like that you included how much technology has changed in your life time. The changes since I was in school are truly amazing. When I was in third grade I was amazed that our teacher had an electronic typewriter. Now they are all but obsolete. I enjoyed reading your post, thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete